Newsletter – February 20, 2019

February 20, 2019

Newsletter – February 20, 2019

“Sure, I put the dumbbell there, but it’s your fault I tripped on it”. No Duty to Warn of Obvious Risks; Hosseinkhani v. QK Fitness Inc., 2019 ONSC 70

By Dolden Wallace Folick Toronto

You want to be healthy so you sign up for a gym membership. You go every week and follow the trainer’s instructions. You are told to run, so you run. You are told to do push-ups, you do them. You are told to use a dumbell, you do. Do you also have to be told that when you put the dumbell down there is a risk you might trip over it?

In Hosseinkhani v. QK Fitness Inc., the Ontario Superior Court granted summary judgment to the defendant gym and found that there is no duty to warn of obvious risks – in this case, a dumbbell the plaintiff had herself placed on the floor.

The plaintiff alleged that she sustained injuries while participating in a group aerobics class involving the use of steps and dumbbells – a class she had attended biweekly for about 8 months.

During the class, the participants were instructed on how and where to place their dumbbells. The plaintiff did not follow the instructions. While coming off the step, the plaintiff tripped and fell on one of her dumbbells, which she states had rolled from its original position. The plaintiff alleges that the gym was negligent by failing to warn the plaintiff of this risk.

The Court noted that the Occupiers’ Liability Act (“OLA”), does not impose strict liability; that an occupier need not remove every possibility of danger; and that Courts must assess the OLA with common sense. Most importantly, there is no duty to warn an adult of an obvious risk.

In granting summary judgment, the Court found that the risk of a dumbbell rolling from its place is “obvious” and, therefore, the defendant did not have a duty to warn the plaintiff. The Court noted, “accidents can occur without anyone being negligent”.

Interestingly, the exclusion of liability clause, which formed part of the gym membership agreement, was insufficient to warrant summary judgment. The Court found that the defendant failed to satisfy the onus of proving that it complied with s. 5(3) of the OLA, which required it to take “reasonable steps” to inform the plaintiff of the exclusion.

Take Away

There is no duty to warn an adult of an obvious risk. While this may appear simplistic, what is “obvious” is open to interpretation. However, when defending trip/slip and fall claims, one should always consider pleading that the risk was “obvious”.

Additionally, the Court re-affirmed that to rely on an exclusion of liability clause contained in a gym membership agreement, an occupier must take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of the other party. Otherwise, it is of no value to the occupier.

Chris Stribopoulos
Tel: 647 798 0605
Email: [email protected]

Please contact the editor if you would like others in your organization to receive this publication.

We're here to Help

Work With Us

Globe and Mail Best Law Firms 2022 Canadian Lawyer Magazine 2021-2022 Top 10 Insurance Defence Boutique Canadian Lawyer Magazine 2023-2024 Top 10 Insurance Defence Boutique

Named One of Canada's Top Insurance Defence Litigation Boutiques by Canadian Lawyer magazine